Dollars and Sense

Dollars and SenseThis semester, I have been taking an MBA elective with Professor Reuben McDaniel called Information and Knowledge Management. The final requirement of the class was to write a research paper addressing the topic “How do you get people to do what they already know to do?” My research paper involves accounting, so I thought it would be appropriate to discuss on this blog. Also, it introduces the kind of thinking you can be exposed to in some of the graduate business electives you can take.

So… about my research paper. The knowing-doing gap I was particularly interested in was why managers continue to make short-term, profit-maximizing, decisions when they know they should be making decisions that will benefit the long term strategic direction of the organization. I especially wanted to see if financial accounting standards and accounting information systems played a role in contributing to this short term decision making. My (albeit amateur) research proved to yield some very interesting results.

What I found out:

What I have always thought about financial accounting was that it was to track financial performance of a company in a given period.

What I’ve learned from my research is that accounting is actually a method to measure the quality of management’s decisions in contributing to the long-term organizational survival of the firm… at least it can be.

What this means for all of you as future managers is that by implementing certain accounting standards and methods into the accounting information system of a company, you will be able to establish an information network for yourself that can not only integrate your organization’s long term organizational goals into your daily operations, but provide potentially daily feedback on how your decisions are contributing to sustainability objectives, natural resource management, the value your employees are bringing to the organization, how effective your recruiting and firing processes are, etc.

Ultimately, accounting can provide the framework and information managers need to enable them to make the decisions they already know they need to make for the long term benefit of the organization, and ease short term pressure from shareholders.

How I arrived to this:

Financial accounting as we know it has been limited to tracking current financial value and performance of firms because the ingrained idea in most of classic economics and traditional business theory is that a corporation’s sole purpose is to maximize short term profits. This flawed image of the role of a company is deeply embedded in the American capitalist system, even if evidence doesn’t support it. This image of a company as merely a vessel to maximize profits molds the actions of most corporations, constraining them to focus on maximizing short-term profits and delivering returns to shareholders. Their decisions are expressed by accountants in financial terms, because that is what measures the value they bring to shareholders.

According to Rosabeth Kanter in her Harvard Business Review article “How Great Companies Think Differently”, companies command enormous resources that influence the world for better or worse and their strategies shape the lives of the employees, partners, and consumers on whom they depend. Above all, the traditional view of business and accounting methods of today doesn’t capture the way great companies think their way to success.

Business is an intrinsic part of society, much like family, government, and religion, and has been one of society’s pillars since the dawn of the industrial era. Great companies should work to make money, obviously, but in their decisions on how to generate profits, they think about building institutions that can survive. Companies that want to achieve organizational survival in a complex world are aware of the need to build people and society.

The social logic that some of the best performing and most enduring companies follow demands that companies be more than instruments for generating money. This logic also provides a framework for accomplishing societal purposes and for providing meaningful livelihoods for those who work in them. According to institutional logic, the value a company creates shouldn’t simply be measured in terms of short-term profits or paychecks, but also in terms of how it sustains the conditions that allow it to flourish over time.

Rather than viewing organizational processes as ways of extracting more economic value, great companies create frameworks that use societal vale and human values as decision making criteria. Managers of great companies hold the perspective that their organization has a purpose and that they can meet stakeholders’ needs in many ways: by producing goods and services that improve the lives of users; by providing jobs and enhancing workers’ quality of life; by developing a strong network of suppliers and business partners; and by ensuring financial viability, which provides resources for improvements, innovations, and returns to investors.

New accounting methods, such as sustainability and HR accounting, can potentially measure companies’ abilities to operate in a sustainable environment and measure the value of the jobs and qualities of life they provide for employees.

What was surprising to me:

I have always been very proud to be in the number one accounting program in the country. I believe accountants play a very important role in business in that we are responsible for measuring and reporting how successful a company has been operating in a year, and the information we provide helps managers, creditors, and investors alike in making important decisions. But what I have learned in the process of this paper is that I have fallen into this knowing-doing gap myself and find myself unconsciously thinking that a company’s success can only be measured by its finances, even though I know this isn’t true from the management and strategy classes I have taken.

A lot of people think of entrepreneurs as the people that can use business to make a difference in the world, and I have always assumed that accountants can’t have a piece of this pie. However, with ideas like sustainability and HR accounting, it turns out we can in the future. We can help demand and develop accounting standards that measure all of the aspects that make a firm successful and report on how well businesses are doing on multiple fronts that to enable corporate managers to make long-term oriented decisions that can both grow their corporation and benefit society and the world we are living in.

Recruiting: Semester Wrap-Up

Dwight_MemCan it really be the end of the semester already?! Time flies when you are having fun and that is exactly what the recruiting semester as an MPA is, FUN! As the semester comes to a close, I realize I have had such a great experience recruiting and have learned so much more about all of the firms. I have been taken to all sorts of different restaurants, venues, etc. around Austin that I have never been to, all due to recruiting events.

I last left off talking about interview week. Well after interview week, you get your callbacks inviting you either for an office visit or maybe just inviting you to recruiting events. Each firm has a different process as far as when they schedule your office visits. They are really good at communicating this with you and are always available for any questions you may have. After you get the callbacks, you start getting invited to one event per firm per week until your finals period. Be prepared to be busy!! I suggest keeping all of your options open, recruiting with as many companies as you can, but be careful to not bite off more than you can chew. School is just as important as finding the perfect job (since you need to graduate to even start your job!) so really think about your schedule before moving forward with recruiting. Once you start attending recruiting events, you sort of find your niche. You will be recruiting with the same group of students usually for each firm and you will start seeing the same recruiters at each event every week, which helps you make new friends both with recruiters and students. Then after all of the events, you will have your office visits! If all goes well, after your office visits you may receive an internship offer. The decision is never easy, but as long as you go with your gut you will end up where you are suppose to be!

I hope you guys have enjoyed reading my recruiting process as much as I have enjoyed going through it. Third year MPAs usually do one of three things during the summer after their third year: industry internship, summer school, or study abroad (sometimes study abroad and summer school together). I will be doing a full semester of classes this summer. I hope that everyone had a great semester and that your summer is filled with good times!! Oh, and good luck on finals! 🙂

“A good judge is better than an unbiased one”…?

Russian judge Shekhovtseva hugging Russian gold medalist... demonstration of independence?
Russian judge Shekhovtseva hugging Russian gold medalist… demonstration of independence?

In case you couldn’t tell by the number of figure skating posts I have written earlier, I follow the sport very closely as a judge.

At this year’s Sochi Olympics, the Ladies Free Skating event was filled with public backlash and drama. This is because reigning Olympic champion, Yuna Kim (or Queen Yuna as some of us like to call her) skated two flawless programs and won this year’s silver medal, missing the gold by a large margin to Russian teenager Adelina Sotnikova.

Fueling the outrage was the apparent lack of independence of the judges and officials of the event, most notably Alla Shekhovtseva of Russia and Yuri Blakov of Ukraine. The former judge is married to the head of the Russian figure skating organization and was the judge seen and photographed hugging the gold medal winner moments after the competition. The latter was formally suspended for trying to fix a result during the 1998 Olympics and allegedly has ties to Moscow.

The Korean Olympic Committee has decided this week to file a complaint to the International Skating Union about an alleged breach of the code of ethics during the ladies competition. The KOC and Korean Skating Union are asking for a thorough investigation for the judging composition and whether it was biased toward Russian gold medalist Sotnikova.

The ISU does prohibit judges from judging in competitive events where they have a conflict of interest, a conflict of interest being defined as:

The term “family” as used in this Rule shall be understood as including all persons, who, due to their relationships, may reasonably appear to be in a conflict of interest position regarding a competing Skater, ineligible person or remunerated Coach.

It could be argued that marital ties to the Russian skating federation falls under this definition, calling into question her independence.

As we all know and can appreciate as accountants, independence is one of the core principles of auditing. A statement attesting to the validity of a company’s financial statements means nothing without some reasonable level of independence. Part of the reason this scandal fascinates me so much is how important the concept of independence can be seen (and ignored apparently) in so many areas of the world, most notably in sports.

With the accounting perception in mind, read the following quote made by ISU President Ottavio Cinquanta to the Chicago Tribune the day after the ladies Olympic champion was announced:

“Would you rather have an idiot acting as a judge than a good one who is a relative of the manager of a federation?…It is far more important to have a good judge than a possible conflict of interest.”

Ummm…what? The auditor training in me is cringing. Imagine if a corporation said this about it’s auditors?

To even become entry-level staff on an audit engagement requires a masters degree and a CPA certification, meaning that there will not be any idiots touching your financial statements. Without independence and people believing your attestation is valid and unbiased, there’s no point. It can’t be relied on.

Competing With Engineers for a Sustainable World

A couple of months ago, we all received an invitation to compete in BASF’s Team Chemistry challenge. A fellow MPA student decided to formTexas-mascot a group, and so I joined. It seemed like a fun project – come up with ideas to lessen the environmental impact of football gameday. I love football gameday and I have an interest in environmental sustainability, so it was like a match made in heaven. Of course, the incentive of winning a bunch of money didn’t hurt.

So, we set to work coming up with ideas on how to approach the problem.  We easily came up with a host of small solutions that would have some impact, but quickly got bogged down in the details. After spending some more time pondering our work, we decided to focus on a group  of related solutions and hone in on them.  As Joel said in his most recent article about accountants being risk-averse, we learned from our initial mistakes, found the proper balance, and ended up with some pretty cool ideas.

We were invited to a couple of events by BASF and the Athletic Department to learn more about the initiative and the goals of the competition. One event was a sustainability panel sponsored by UT Engineers for a Sustainable World. The panel was entirely made up of engineers and the audience was entirely engineers … except two of us MPA students. It was very intimidating hearing about them discussing various polymers of which we had no clue of their existence much less their properties. Apparently these students have a big advantage over us with their knowledge of chemicals, considering BASF is essentially a chemical company. The next event was a stadium tour, during which our guides told us about their issues with waste management. Their focus seemed to be only on waste management problems, while our solutions did little to address that.

ConcoursePoster_#2_Sec120But, we pressed on, confident in the power of our ideas despite not having the technical knowledge that is certainly common among our competition. What we do have is a business ingenuity that enabled us to come up with feasible solutions that are easily implemented and have a measurable impact. We used the skills we have learned in economics, finance, and accounting to estimate the results of our proposals. We also used our branding and presentation skills to develop a persuasive format through which to deliver our proposal.

We find out Friday if we are invited to the finalist round, where we will present and defend our ideas in a “shark tank” environment. We’ve had fun putting it all together, and we’re proud of our accomplishments, but it would be great to get to write a “Part II” to this article about our preparation for the finalist round!

 

MPA Council and the ICAEW: The future of global auditing

icaewIn late February, Program Director Jim Franklin and Department Chair Lillian Mills were able to have some members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Whales (ICAEW), one of the leading institutions publishing articles about the profession internationally, to come and speak about the future of global auditing with members of MPA Council.

We were asked the question “What challenges do you think the auditing profession currently faces?” and “If you lived on a small island where all the companies did not have to have their financial statements audited because everyone trusted each other. If you wanted to open the island to foreign-based companies, what protections would you put in place?”

The resulting discussion I felt was fascinating, as it combined the knowledge I’ve developed in both my auditing and complexity theory categories. I feel these two questions are extremely related, and here’s why:

Let’s say we are on the small island described above. There is no need for audited financial statements because there is trust between the companies and shareholders. We face the decision of requiring audited financial statements in the face of foreign companies wanting to sell shares on our island because we do not have the same trust in these companies. Auditors would become in demand because of a lack of trust between company management and investors.

If shareholders feel they have been presented fraudulent financial statements, they will blame the auditors for not catching it. Even though it was the company that committed the fraud, the highly-trained auditors did everything they were supposed to do, a disproportional amount of blame falls upon the auditors.

This blame falls on the auditors because most people don’t fully understand the role of the auditors and the work they do. They just expect them to catch all and any fraud. This is what we discuss in auditing class as the expectations gap. Because people don’t understand the training and qualifications we have, and the limited nature of our job, we can only do so much to prevent fraud. Companies preparing the financial statements are the ones ultimately responsible.

Also, auditors are held accountable for the effectiveness of accounting standards. The problem with this is that the world is coming more and more complex, and companies are quickly adapting their operations in order to survive in the complex world. Frequently, we can’t keep up in developing accounting standards to reflect these new and innovative ways of doing business. Technically, a company’s financial statements could be following GAAP, but the core economics of the transactions are misrepresented.

Because of this expectation gap and lack of trust that is continually strengthened by corporate fraud, a a decent amount of people are mistrusting auditors for “not doing our job.”

The answer seems to be to close the expectations gap and to increase people’s trust in our services. The million dollar question, though, is how in the world can we do that?

MPA Student Life Blog